[Read] ➯ Choosing Your Faith: In a World of Spiritual Options Author Mark Mittelberg – Horse-zine.co.uk


Choosing Your Faith: In a World of Spiritual Options quotes Choosing Your Faith: In a World of Spiritual Options, litcharts Choosing Your Faith: In a World of Spiritual Options, symbolism Choosing Your Faith: In a World of Spiritual Options, summary shmoop Choosing Your Faith: In a World of Spiritual Options, Choosing Your Faith: In a World of Spiritual Options b1b09bc6 In A World Of Spiritual Options, People Constantly Tell Us What To Believe Yet, While We Hear These Pleas, We Re Already Functioning With Existing Beliefs Even If They Are Beliefs By Default So How Do We Choose What To Believe Especially In The Area Of Faith Do We Need To Choose In Choosing Your Faith, Mark Mittelberg Encourages Us, As Socrates Does, Not To Lead An Unexamined Life He Invites Us To Examine Why We Believe What We Believe This Examination Will Resonate With Christians And Seekers Alike


10 thoughts on “Choosing Your Faith: In a World of Spiritual Options

  1. says:

    Compelling and amazing I wish I had this book when I had my Philosophy of Religion and theology classes back in my university This book nicely bridges the two disciplines together in a compelling manner I like how the book is structured The first half of the book presents the philosophical foundations by which we must measure our faith It draws theories from classical philosophers such as Socrates, Augustine of Hippo, Descartes, Hume, Nietzsche, to the philosophers of our time, say Dawkins, and C S Lewis which is exactly like my Philosophy of Religion class under Fr Masong I miss that class From these philosophical foundations, the author makes an argument for the validity of Christianity on the second half of the book I thought that this book would just be like other Christian apologetics books which prove the Bible using the Bible itself Instead, the author tried as much as he can to measure Christianity and subtly, other religions by the philosophical standards he set up at the beginning of the book.I like how this book arrives at a definition of faith after all the arguments presented Wise, spiritual faith the kind I m advocating is a commitment of trust based on solid, though incomplete, evidence that we re believing in the right things and moving in the best direction 221 222, emphasis mine.I agree that this book resonates a lot to both Christian and non Christian faith seekers alike This book made me remember my first lesson in Catholic theology back in my first year in my university I was a Protestant and I was so cynical of everything Catholic Yet my Jesuit education taught me that we all may walk different paths, but all these paths lead to God even the path of disbelief This book totally embodies my biggest takeaway from my Jesuit education that we are to have fides quaerens intellectum.


  2. says:

    Compelling and amazing I wish I had this book when I had my Philosophy of Religion and theology classes back in my university This book nicely bridges the two disciplines together in a compelling manner I like how the book is structured The first half of the book presents the philosophical foundations by which we must measure our faith It draws theories from classical philosophers such as Socrates, Augustine of Hippo, Descartes, Hume, Nietzsche, to the philosophers of our time, say Dawkins, and C S Lewis which is exactly like my Philosophy of Religion class under Fr Masong I miss that class From these philosophical foundations, the author makes an argument for the validity of Christianity on the second half of the book I thought that this book would just be like other Christian apologetics books which prove the Bible using the Bible itself Instead, the author tried as much as he can to measure Christianity and subtly, other religions by the philosophical standards he set up at the beginning of the book.I like how this book arrives at a definition of faith after all the arguments presented Wise, spiritual faith the kind I m advocating is a commitment of trust based on solid, though incomplete, evidence that we re believing in the right things and moving in the best direction 221 222, emphasis mine.I agree that this book resonates a lot to both Christian and non Christian faith seekers alike This book made me remember my first lesson in Catholic theology back in my first year in my university I was a Protestant and I was so cynical of everything Catholic Yet my Jesuit education taught me that we all may walk different paths, but all these paths lead to God even the path of disbelief This book totally embodies my biggest takeaway from my Jesuit education that we are to have fides quaerens intellectum.


  3. says:

    Compelling and amazing I wish I had this book when I had my Philosophy of Religion and theology classes back in my university This book nicely bridges the two disciplines together in a compelling manner I like how the book is structured The first half of the book presents the philosophical foundations by which we must measure our faith It draws theories from classical philosophers such as Socrates, Augustine of Hippo, Descartes, Hume, Nietzsche, to the philosophers of our time, say Dawkins, and C S Lewis which is exactly like my Philosophy of Religion class under Fr Masong I miss that class From these philosophical foundations, the author makes an argument for the validity of Christianity on the second half of the book I thought that this book would just be like other Christian apologetics books which prove the Bible using the Bible itself Instead, the author tried as much as he can to measure Christianity and subtly, other religions by the philosophical standards he set up at the beginning of the book.I like how this book arrives at a definition of faith after all the arguments presented Wise, spiritual faith the kind I m advocating is a commitment of trust based on solid, though incomplete, evidence that we re believing in the right things and moving in the best direction 221 222, emphasis mine.I agree that this book resonates a lot to both Christian and non Christian faith seekers alike This book made me remember my first lesson in Catholic theology back in my first year in my university I was a Protestant and I was so cynical of everything Catholic Yet my Jesuit education taught me that we all may walk different paths, but all these paths lead to God even the path of disbelief This book totally embodies my biggest takeaway from my Jesuit education that we are to have fides quaerens intellectum.


  4. says:

    Compelling and amazing I wish I had this book when I had my Philosophy of Religion and theology classes back in my university This book nicely bridges the two disciplines together in a compelling manner I like how the book is structured The first half of the book presents the philosophical foundations by which we must measure our faith It draws theories from classical philosophers such as Socrates, Augustine of Hippo, Descartes, Hume, Nietzsche, to the philosophers of our time, say Dawkins, and C S Lewis which is exactly like my Philosophy of Religion class under Fr Masong I miss that class From these philosophical foundations, the author makes an argument for the validity of Christianity on the second half of the book I thought that this book would just be like other Christian apologetics books which prove the Bible using the Bible itself Instead, the author tried as much as he can to measure Christianity and subtly, other religions by the philosophical standards he set up at the beginning of the book.I like how this book arrives at a definition of faith after all the arguments presented Wise, spiritual faith the kind I m advocating is a commitment of trust based on solid, though incomplete, evidence that we re believing in the right things and moving in the best direction 221 222, emphasis mine.I agree that this book resonates a lot to both Christian and non Christian faith seekers alike This book made me remember my first lesson in Catholic theology back in my first year in my university I was a Protestant and I was so cynical of everything Catholic Yet my Jesuit education taught me that we all may walk different paths, but all these paths lead to God even the path of disbelief This book totally embodies my biggest takeaway from my Jesuit education that we are to have fides quaerens intellectum.


  5. says:

    Compelling and amazing I wish I had this book when I had my Philosophy of Religion and theology classes back in my university This book nicely bridges the two disciplines together in a compelling manner I like how the book is structured The first half of the book presents the philosophical foundations by which we must measure our faith It draws theories from classical philosophers such as Socrates, Augustine of Hippo, Descartes, Hume, Nietzsche, to the philosophers of our time, say Dawkins, and C S Lewis which is exactly like my Philosophy of Religion class under Fr Masong I miss that class From these philosophical foundations, the author makes an argument for the validity of Christianity on the second half of the book I thought that this book would just be like other Christian apologetics books which prove the Bible using the Bible itself Instead, the author tried as much as he can to measure Christianity and subtly, other religions by the philosophical standards he set up at the beginning of the book.I like how this book arrives at a definition of faith after all the arguments presented Wise, spiritual faith the kind I m advocating is a commitment of trust based on solid, though incomplete, evidence that we re believing in the right things and moving in the best direction 221 222, emphasis mine.I agree that this book resonates a lot to both Christian and non Christian faith seekers alike This book made me remember my first lesson in Catholic theology back in my first year in my university I was a Protestant and I was so cynical of everything Catholic Yet my Jesuit education taught me that we all may walk different paths, but all these paths lead to God even the path of disbelief This book totally embodies my biggest takeaway from my Jesuit education that we are to have fides quaerens intellectum.


  6. says:

    Compelling and amazing I wish I had this book when I had my Philosophy of Religion and theology classes back in my university This book nicely bridges the two disciplines together in a compelling manner I like how the book is structured The first half of the book presents the philosophical foundations by which we must measure our faith It draws theories from classical philosophers such as Socrates, Augustine of Hippo, Descartes, Hume, Nietzsche, to the philosophers of our time, say Dawkins, and C S Lewis which is exactly like my Philosophy of Religion class under Fr Masong I miss that class From these philosophical foundations, the author makes an argument for the validity of Christianity on the second half of the book I thought that this book would just be like other Christian apologetics books which prove the Bible using the Bible itself Instead, the author tried as much as he can to measure Christianity and subtly, other religions by the philosophical standards he set up at the beginning of the book.I like how this book arrives at a definition of faith after all the arguments presented Wise, spiritual faith the kind I m advocating is a commitment of trust based on solid, though incomplete, evidence that we re believing in the right things and moving in the best direction 221 222, emphasis mine.I agree that this book resonates a lot to both Christian and non Christian faith seekers alike This book made me remember my first lesson in Catholic theology back in my first year in my university I was a Protestant and I was so cynical of everything Catholic Yet my Jesuit education taught me that we all may walk different paths, but all these paths lead to God even the path of disbelief This book totally embodies my biggest takeaway from my Jesuit education that we are to have fides quaerens intellectum.


  7. says:

    Compelling and amazing I wish I had this book when I had my Philosophy of Religion and theology classes back in my university This book nicely bridges the two disciplines together in a compelling manner I like how the book is structured The first half of the book presents the philosophical foundations by which we must measure our faith It draws theories from classical philosophers such as Socrates, Augustine of Hippo, Descartes, Hume, Nietzsche, to the philosophers of our time, say Dawkins, and C S Lewis which is exactly like my Philosophy of Religion class under Fr Masong I miss that class From these philosophical foundations, the author makes an argument for the validity of Christianity on the second half of the book I thought that this book would just be like other Christian apologetics books which prove the Bible using the Bible itself Instead, the author tried as much as he can to measure Christianity and subtly, other religions by the philosophical standards he set up at the beginning of the book.I like how this book arrives at a definition of faith after all the arguments presented Wise, spiritual faith the kind I m advocating is a commitment of trust based on solid, though incomplete, evidence that we re believing in the right things and moving in the best direction 221 222, emphasis mine.I agree that this book resonates a lot to both Christian and non Christian faith seekers alike This book made me remember my first lesson in Catholic theology back in my first year in my university I was a Protestant and I was so cynical of everything Catholic Yet my Jesuit education taught me that we all may walk different paths, but all these paths lead to God even the path of disbelief This book totally embodies my biggest takeaway from my Jesuit education that we are to have fides quaerens intellectum.


  8. says:

    Compelling and amazing I wish I had this book when I had my Philosophy of Religion and theology classes back in my university This book nicely bridges the two disciplines together in a compelling manner I like how the book is structured The first half of the book presents the philosophical foundations by which we must measure our faith It draws theories from classical philosophers such as Socrates, Augustine of Hippo, Descartes, Hume, Nietzsche, to the philosophers of our time, say Dawkins, and C S Lewis which is exactly like my Philosophy of Religion class under Fr Masong I miss that class From these philosophical foundations, the author makes an argument for the validity of Christianity on the second half of the book I thought that this book would just be like other Christian apologetics books which prove the Bible using the Bible itself Instead, the author tried as much as he can to measure Christianity and subtly, other religions by the philosophical standards he set up at the beginning of the book.I like how this book arrives at a definition of faith after all the arguments presented Wise, spiritual faith the kind I m advocating is a commitment of trust based on solid, though incomplete, evidence that we re believing in the right things and moving in the best direction 221 222, emphasis mine.I agree that this book resonates a lot to both Christian and non Christian faith seekers alike This book made me remember my first lesson in Catholic theology back in my first year in my university I was a Protestant and I was so cynical of everything Catholic Yet my Jesuit education taught me that we all may walk different paths, but all these paths lead to God even the path of disbelief This book totally embodies my biggest takeaway from my Jesuit education that we are to have fides quaerens intellectum.


  9. says:

    Compelling and amazing I wish I had this book when I had my Philosophy of Religion and theology classes back in my university This book nicely bridges the two disciplines together in a compelling manner I like how the book is structured The first half of the book presents the philosophical foundations by which we must measure our faith It draws theories from classical philosophers such as Socrates, Augustine of Hippo, Descartes, Hume, Nietzsche, to the philosophers of our time, say Dawkins, and C S Lewis which is exactly like my Philosophy of Religion class under Fr Masong I miss that class From these philosophical foundations, the author makes an argument for the validity of Christianity on the second half of the book I thought that this book would just be like other Christian apologetics books which prove the Bible using the Bible itself Instead, the author tried as much as he can to measure Christianity and subtly, other religions by the philosophical standards he set up at the beginning of the book.I like how this book arrives at a definition of faith after all the arguments presented Wise, spiritual faith the kind I m advocating is a commitment of trust based on solid, though incomplete, evidence that we re believing in the right things and moving in the best direction 221 222, emphasis mine.I agree that this book resonates a lot to both Christian and non Christian faith seekers alike This book made me remember my first lesson in Catholic theology back in my first year in my university I was a Protestant and I was so cynical of everything Catholic Yet my Jesuit education taught me that we all may walk different paths, but all these paths lead to God even the path of disbelief This book totally embodies my biggest takeaway from my Jesuit education that we are to have fides quaerens intellectum.


  10. says:

    Compelling and amazing I wish I had this book when I had my Philosophy of Religion and theology classes back in my university This book nicely bridges the two disciplines together in a compelling manner I like how the book is structured The first half of the book presents the philosophical foundations by which we must measure our faith It draws theories from classical philosophers such as Socrates, Augustine of Hippo, Descartes, Hume, Nietzsche, to the philosophers of our time, say Dawkins, and C S Lewis which is exactly like my Philosophy of Religion class under Fr Masong I miss that class From these philosophical foundations, the author makes an argument for the validity of Christianity on the second half of the book I thought that this book would just be like other Christian apologetics books which prove the Bible using the Bible itself Instead, the author tried as much as he can to measure Christianity and subtly, other religions by the philosophical standards he set up at the beginning of the book.I like how this book arrives at a definition of faith after all the arguments presented Wise, spiritual faith the kind I m advocating is a commitment of trust based on solid, though incomplete, evidence that we re believing in the right things and moving in the best direction 221 222, emphasis mine.I agree that this book resonates a lot to both Christian and non Christian faith seekers alike This book made me remember my first lesson in Catholic theology back in my first year in my university I was a Protestant and I was so cynical of everything Catholic Yet my Jesuit education taught me that we all may walk different paths, but all these paths lead to God even the path of disbelief This book totally embodies my biggest takeaway from my Jesuit education that we are to have fides quaerens intellectum.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *